Contrasting and Critically Examining two views Essay

Contrasting and Critically Examining two views - Essay Example One major issue in this regard is the formulation of strategic alliances by Transnational Corporations. Transnational Corporations are the large organisations which operate in different countries and focus on local preferences and demands. These organisations formulate strategies according to the needs and requirements of the local region. It is important to establish at this point that these Transnational Corporations (TNCs) have become one of the most strong unit in the economic and political setup all over the globe. These Transnational Corporations (TNCs) have been coming up with different economic strategies in order to fulfil their objectives and goals. In this regard these organisations have formed different strategic alliances and have entered into different subcontracts, which in turn are allowing them to operate successfully in the international market (Kale, P, Singh, H, & Perlmutter, 2000). This phenomenon has given rise to one of the largest dilemma in the business secto r i.e. that either global market forces have resulted in the formulation of these strategic alliances or these subcontracts and strategic alliances are being used as a strategy by these organisation in order to get hold of more resources. According to one school of thought, these economic strategies of subcontracting and strategic alliances are because of different global market forces. Transnational Organisations (TNCs) are forced to use these strategies in order to respond to the changing economic, political, social, and technological forces in the international market. On the other hand, there is a second school of thought which is of the view that these economic strategies of subcontracting and strategic alliance are being used by the Transnational Organisations (TNCs) for their own benefits. These strategies facilitate the organisations in the process of gaining more control over the resources as compared to other small companies and communities and as a result controlling the overall international economy (Gereffi, Humphrey, Kaplinsky, & Sturgeon, 2001). In this paper an attempt has been made to compare and critically review these two views. For this purpose, views of both school of thoughts have been presented and investigated. Apart from this the basic idea of Transnational Corporations (TNCs) and the associated economic strategies have also been explained. This will help in the process of exploring and critically evaluating the two views about the increasing subcontracting and strategic alliances by different Transnational Corporations (TNCs). TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS (TNCs): There have been considerable growth in the number of Multinational Organisations (MNCs) or Transnational Corporations (TNCs). This is mainly because of the increasing international trade and globalisation. Owing to increasing international demand, organisations expanded their operations and businesses in different countries. This not only resulted in benefiting these organisati ons by also contributed in the growth and development of overall global economy. With the passage of time, Transnational Corporations (TNCs) became one of the essential player in the international economy. These organisations with the aim of increasing profits and revenues have been keep on exploring and exploiting different areas and regions. Recently, Transnational Cor

Having Sex, Getting Sex and Getting Gotten Essay

Having Sex, Getting Sex and Getting Gotten - Essay Example It is also true that individuals in a relationship the feel they are over benefiting also report lower levels of satisfaction (Cohen, 2006). This theory seems to ignore the idea of attachment and relationships. It seems to be treating sex as a business relationship as is described in the text. That seems extreme when even the social exchange theory, which says that intimacy is the product of a reward-cost history in the interaction between two people, understands that intimacy is involved. It is believed that intimacy is relative. Not all intimate relationships are the same. The social exchange theory is an attempt to explain all intimate relationships, not as irrational or selfless, but as a product of the fact that people love those who offer more rewards and fewer punishments than others. The loved one must not only be desirable but must reciprocate one’s attentions. This theory would say that people who fall in love begin by engaging in a kind of bargaining process wherein assets and debits are evaluated and matched. Looking for love means searching for rewards and punishments. Research does seem to support bo th the social exchange theory and the equity hypothesis as explanations for the first phases of pair formation. Several surveys indicate that both parties in an demonstrated that both members of an inequitable relationship were unhappy. The question that comes from this is, it there no such thing as unconditional love? The social exchange theory does the best job of describing liking rather than love. Our text does not even get to the point of liking the individual rather it is liking of the act or intercourse and possibly exploiting another to get it or being willing to be exploited to get it (Stevins-Long & Commons, 2002). Again, this writer goes back to developmental stages. The adolescent may begin in this equity bargaining stage of